ghost-modernism


The tumblr of interdisciplinary artist sid branca. A place for things I find compelling.
Content on this page is not my work unless otherwise noted.
Please note that this sometimes includes nudity or graphic content that may be NSFW.
You can find my writing here and follow me on twitter here.
Ask


→
alright, Advertising, let me be straight with you for a second here: where on earth are you getting your numbers? if slut-shaming is the name of the game, at least break 30, for christ’s sake, this girl is at least 18! 
just in case that was too subtle: I am joking and irritated. if this ad thinks this woman is a nasty ho, lord knows what it would make of me, as someone who has slept with almost twice as many people over the course of the past several years. (although if the idea is that she boned 20 dudes at once or in a single day, not over all time, that is super duper intense but still HER PREROGATIVE, broheim.)
also, this is very much one of those situations in which I wonder what the response would be if this ad featured a male model—or perhaps even more interestingly, a gay male model. I feel like this idea would be less upsetting if displayed only as part of a multi-gendered triptych? thoughts, internet?
bananafin:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.
Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.
She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.
It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.
It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.

I’ve seen this floating around, and it makes me so profoundly uncomfortable. It’s up there with the Sex Without A Condom Means You’re Fucking Hitler commercial. 

alright, Advertising, let me be straight with you for a second here: where on earth are you getting your numbers? if slut-shaming is the name of the game, at least break 30, for christ’s sake, this girl is at least 18! 

just in case that was too subtle: I am joking and irritated. if this ad thinks this woman is a nasty ho, lord knows what it would make of me, as someone who has slept with almost twice as many people over the course of the past several years. (although if the idea is that she boned 20 dudes at once or in a single day, not over all time, that is super duper intense but still HER PREROGATIVE, broheim.)

also, this is very much one of those situations in which I wonder what the response would be if this ad featured a male model—or perhaps even more interestingly, a gay male model. I feel like this idea would be less upsetting if displayed only as part of a multi-gendered triptych? thoughts, internet?

bananafin:

coketalk:

This may be a campaign about HIV/AIDS awareness, but that’s no excuse. This is blatant misogyny, really sinister stuff that conveys a much more profound message about the female body.

Take another look at it. She’s got a killer smile, but still, you can’t see her eyes. The model is cropped so that she’s essentially headless. What makes her human is gone. What makes her a woman is on display. That’s a very deliberate creative choice.

She is an object to be fucked without a brain or an identity. Worse still, her vagina is a fully indexed destination on a Google map. The visual metaphor is so potent (and porn is so ubiquitous) that this image is more jarring than one in which she shows us her actual pussy.

It’s not about the fact that she’s had sex with Bill Johnson and 19 others. Who gives a fuck? What’s toxic is the idea that they checked into her vagina on Foursquare. It’s saying is that a her private parts aren’t private at all. They’re public. That’s the implicit message in this image, and it’s degrading as hell.

It’s not slut-shaming so much as it’s female-shaming, and it reinforces the age-old cultural narrative that women’s bodies aren’t their own.

I’ve seen this floating around, and it makes me so profoundly uncomfortable. It’s up there with the Sex Without A Condom Means You’re Fucking Hitler commercial. 

3 months ago  Notes (6604)
  1. destroybuzzlightyear reblogged this from sluffinator
  2. leonrw liked this
  3. hannahst liked this
  4. zdurovchic reblogged this from jamesandthegiantslut and added:
    People sure get angry about stuff.
  5. asian-girlfriend liked this
  6. jamesandthegiantslut reblogged this from terminalcaseofnoveltytitcunts and added:
    I don’t think people realize that there are male versions of this as well..
  7. terminalcaseofnoveltytitcunts reblogged this from mercuryandmoonlight and added:
    #misogyny, #sexism, #rape culture, ‘THEY WOULDN’T DO THIS WITH A GUYS PACKAGE”
  8. inbetween-daze liked this
  9. sluffinator reblogged this from patshit
  10. patshit reblogged this from onlyslightly
  11. someofmybestfriends liked this
  12. liiinux liked this
  13. dog-master liked this
  14. r--tgrrrl reblogged this from priincess-meeghan
  15. miniiiiiii liked this
  16. ultimate--frisbee liked this
  17. totheonlygirl reblogged this from seapunkk
  18. xliesareentertainmentx liked this
  19. rrabbitz liked this
  20. seapunkk reblogged this from princessponyta
  21. priincess-meeghan reblogged this from cherrybombzine
  22. usmcbratt reblogged this from lovelynightingale
  23. kamikazkei liked this
  24. throatfucker liked this
  25. aapocalypstick liked this
  26. ikankebabs liked this
  27. captchablogue reblogged this from mercuryandmoonlight
  28. mercuryandmoonlight reblogged this from talkingfruitbat and added:
    I bet they don’t have this ad with just a guy’s package sitting there mapped by google, like ‘do you know what’s been...
  29. enajcosta reblogged this from doodlyroses and added:
    The world makes me sick.
  30. ribbonsandbowsxo liked this
  31. skeptic-tank reblogged this from coketalk
  32. hermixtape reblogged this from hermixtape
  33. nawduhdummy reblogged this from spermcunt1964
  34. spermcunt1964 reblogged this from funkies
  35. dontrustlemyjimmies liked this
  36. sleeplessinseoul liked this
  37. bonnywithasea liked this
  38. audrey-day liked this
  39. octopyuss reblogged this from stoical-bunny
  40. perniciousandmeagre liked this
  41. ashley-elle liked this
  42. stoical-bunny reblogged this from comrade-ringo
  43. skyconnoisseur liked this
  44. genuinerevision liked this
  45. neveradullmomentwithjordangibson liked this
  46. songbirdsweresinging reblogged this from size-too-small
  47. coatseye reblogged this from irutashi
  48. chimericalvagary liked this
  49. ilenva reblogged this from size-too-small and added:
    But sometimes something like this is what it takes for people to finally pay attention.
  50. buttsexington liked this
  51. Show more notesLoading...
← Older   1/1   Newer →

feather by eric hu